<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Online Writing Is/Isn&#8217;t Making Students Better Writers</title>
	<atom:link href="http://iblogo.com/2009/06/24/online-writing-isisnt-making-students-better-writers/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://iblogo.com/2009/06/24/online-writing-isisnt-making-students-better-writers/</link>
	<description>IMAGO&#039;s blog about culture, learning and faith</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 00:50:07 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: I Right, Therefore I&#8217;m Bright! &#171; Signposts 02</title>
		<link>http://iblogo.com/2009/06/24/online-writing-isisnt-making-students-better-writers/comment-page-1/#comment-960</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[I Right, Therefore I&#8217;m Bright! &#171; Signposts 02]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 26 Sep 2010 14:30:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://imagocommunity.wordpress.com/?p=1232#comment-960</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] I Right, Therefore I&#8217;m&#160;Bright!  From http://iblogo.com/2009/06/24/online-writing-isisnt-making-students-better-writers/: [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] I Right, Therefore I&#8217;m&nbsp;Bright!  From <a href="http://iblogo.com/2009/06/24/online-writing-isisnt-making-students-better-writers/" rel="nofollow">http://iblogo.com/2009/06/24/online-writing-isisnt-making-students-better-writers/</a>: [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dr. Sanford Aranoff</title>
		<link>http://iblogo.com/2009/06/24/online-writing-isisnt-making-students-better-writers/comment-page-1/#comment-233</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Dr. Sanford Aranoff]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Jun 2009 20:34:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://imagocommunity.wordpress.com/?p=1232#comment-233</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[To educate, we need to focus on basic principles of the topic. Schools tend to stress how-to. Writing must clarify the principles, and this is what we need to get across. See &quot;Teaching and Helping Students Think and Do Better&quot; on amazon.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>To educate, we need to focus on basic principles of the topic. Schools tend to stress how-to. Writing must clarify the principles, and this is what we need to get across. See &#8220;Teaching and Helping Students Think and Do Better&#8221; on amazon.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kim</title>
		<link>http://iblogo.com/2009/06/24/online-writing-isisnt-making-students-better-writers/comment-page-1/#comment-231</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Kim]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Jun 2009 16:21:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://imagocommunity.wordpress.com/?p=1232#comment-231</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[When I was growing up the main mode of communication for tweens and teens was the telephone, which had absolutely no benefit to their literacy. Whether the internet will help them develop higher reasoning skills and a good, college worthy writing style depends a lot on what they choose to read -- but at least, for the first time, wonderful content is available in huge quantities at their fingertips.  Meanwhile, Twitter and Facebook can hardly make them less intelligent when the alternatives for most kids are probably the tv, video games, or the cellphone.  (Not to sound like a grumpy old fart.)

I think Professor Brandt&#039;s warning that &quot;They’re going to be reading, but they’re going to be reading to write, and not to be shaped by what they read.&quot; is unnecessary.  In my experience there are things that can prevent me from really taking to heart what I have read, but they have more to do with my biases and assumptions than anything else.  In fact, reading with the intention of being able to effectively communicate what we have read is an essential skill for all good students and writers.  

Where it comes to spiritual content, again, I think it is our biases and assumptions that we need to watch out for.  If we are listening to a sermon with the intention to pass the ideas along and the ASSUMPTION that we&#039;ve got this thing down pat, we are likely to miss something.  But if we are listening, intending to share, and aware that we could quite possibly learn something new, I think we are where we need to be.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When I was growing up the main mode of communication for tweens and teens was the telephone, which had absolutely no benefit to their literacy. Whether the internet will help them develop higher reasoning skills and a good, college worthy writing style depends a lot on what they choose to read &#8212; but at least, for the first time, wonderful content is available in huge quantities at their fingertips.  Meanwhile, Twitter and Facebook can hardly make them less intelligent when the alternatives for most kids are probably the tv, video games, or the cellphone.  (Not to sound like a grumpy old fart.)</p>
<p>I think Professor Brandt&#8217;s warning that &#8220;They’re going to be reading, but they’re going to be reading to write, and not to be shaped by what they read.&#8221; is unnecessary.  In my experience there are things that can prevent me from really taking to heart what I have read, but they have more to do with my biases and assumptions than anything else.  In fact, reading with the intention of being able to effectively communicate what we have read is an essential skill for all good students and writers.  </p>
<p>Where it comes to spiritual content, again, I think it is our biases and assumptions that we need to watch out for.  If we are listening to a sermon with the intention to pass the ideas along and the ASSUMPTION that we&#8217;ve got this thing down pat, we are likely to miss something.  But if we are listening, intending to share, and aware that we could quite possibly learn something new, I think we are where we need to be.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

